 |
| All
finished floor installations must begin with a clean, dry substrate. |
|
There are a host of “standard” procedures on how to prepare
substrates to accept finished floor surfaces. In a perfect world, these
procedures could be applied to every installation, and subfloor issues would be
easy to identify and resolve, and callbacks would be minimal. But, this is not
a perfect world.
The importance of a clean floor
cannot be overemphasized. Just as paint cannot bond to a dirty wall, flooring
products cannot adhere to a poorly prepared substrate. Sometimes it’s as simple
as cleaning the surface and allowing it to dry before installing the new floor.
Other times, additional steps must be taken to assure that the materials being
installed can adhere properly to a substrate.
With changes to the design of cement
backer boards for lightweight applications, the advent of floor heating systems
and an abundance of new products being introduced to the market, it is
imperative to understand product compatibility. For example, a poured gypsum
underlayment may be too absorbent and ultimately cause the finished floor to
delaminate or crack (refer to TCNA Handbook Method F180-07). In this case, the
solution would be to apply a sealer to assure compatibility with the primer or
adhesive you will install over it. While these types of products are helpful,
they may not be appropriate for every installation. A compatibility test is
always recommended.
Other common substrate challenges
include working with damaged substrates, installing over existing floors,
dealing with uneven or cracked surfaces, properly treating floor joints and
protecting against Moisture Vapor Transmission (MVT). The number of products
available to address these issues is numerous, but there’s one little known
solution.
Best known for protecting finished
floors from failure caused by lateral substrate movement, self-adhering
elastomeric crack isolation membranes can often resolve a number of substrate
issues. In situations where substrates are damaged or a renovation calls for
installing a new floor over an existing one, they’re often the most economical
route to achieving a suitable surface ready to accept mortars, adhesives and
epoxy setting materials.
A good example is the ability to
salvage a concrete substrate that is severely cracked yet structurally sound.
This is a scenario not uncommon in shopping malls, commercial buildings and
private homes throughout the United States.
The costs in time and money to remove and replace the slab can be significant.
As a result, the materials preferred
for the finished floor may become cost prohibitive, and of course, installation
time is delayed. Because crack isolation membranes can often be used to cover a
damaged concrete slab at about 25 percent of the cost it would take to replace
it, the ability to use the original finished floor product of choice is
restored.
Another advantage to using membranes
in renovation projects is that many are much thinner than alternate subfloor
materials. Usually 1/8-inch or less in height, they add very little to the
elevation of the subfloor. A residential kitchen renovation no longer has to
mean choosing between a dishwasher that will close and a new ceramic tile
surface.
Another substrate issue some crack
isolation membranes can resolve is protecting finished surfaces from Moisture
Vapor Transmission (MVT), a problem common to new construction and
installations in low-lying geographical areas. Some membranes offer certified
resistance to MVT.
Crack isolation membranes are also
useful for treating floor joints prior to new floor installation. Understanding
the various types of subfloor joints is critical to designing and executing
proper ceramic tile installation. What are commonly called expansion joints are
really four different kinds of joints in sub floors; here is a look at each.
Expansion joints
 |
|
Crack isolation membranes can often be used to expedite
finished floor installations by resolving many subfloor problems.
|
|
A true expansion joint, made of metal or plastic, works
freely from the subfloor. Because it is designed to expand and contract with
both horizontal and vertical movement, this type of joint should never be
covered with a flooring product.
Handling control joints begins with
their placement by the structural engineer/architect, who has in mind how the
floor will move and where the joints should be located to control lateral
shrinkage. Shrinkage for each slab at this joint is about 1/8-inch, totaling
1/4-inch for the two slabs. Once their location is set, they are generally
formed with saw cuts that are about one-quarter the thickness of the slab. They
also can be made with grooved forms, by scoring, or by insertion of molded
non-metallic strips into plastic concrete. According to literature published by
The World of Concrete Center, “The spacing, in feet, of control joints should
equal two to three times the thickness, in inches of the concrete slab.”
While certainly important to the success of the finished
flooring, these joints cause both challenges and dismay for the architect or
floor designer. The tile industry has long recommended that these joints be
brought up through the tile, and that tile be cut to meet all these joints in
the slab. If they don’t line up, something has to make a break between the two
so that the tile doesn’t crack when the slab shrinks – and a break in the
placement of tile on the floor means a break in design.